Defining Standards for Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Surgery in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In 2006, Cancer Care Ontario created Surgical Oncology Standards for the delivery of hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery including hepatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Our objective was to identify the impact of standardization on outcomes after HPB surgery in Ontario, Canada. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a population-level analysis of patients undergoing hepatectomy or PD (2003 to 2019). Logistic regression models were used to compare 30- and 90-day mortality and length of stay (LOS) before (2003 to 2006), during (2007 to 2011), and after (2012 to 2019) standardization. Interrupted time series models were used to co-analyze secular trends. RESULTS: A total of 7,904 hepatectomies and 5,238 PDs were performed. More than 80% of all cases were performed at a designated center (DC) before standardization. This increased to >98% in the poststandardization era. Median volumes at DCs increased from 55 to 67 hepatectomies/year and from 22 to 50 PDs/year over time. In addition, 30-day mortality after hepatectomy was 2.6% before standardization and 2.3% after standardization (p = 0.9); 30-day mortality after PD was 3.6% before standardization and 2.4% after standardization (p = 0.1). Multivariable analyses revealed a significant difference in 90-day mortality following PD poststandardization (4.3% vs 6.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.7; p = 0.03). Median LOS was shorter for hepatectomy (6 days vs 8 days) and PD (9 days vs 14 days; p < 0.0001) after standardization. Immediate and late effects on mortality and LOS were likely attributable to secular trends, which predated standardization. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization was associated with a higher volume of hepatectomy and PDs with further concentration of care at DCs. Pre-existing quality initiatives may have attenuated the effect of standardization on quality outcomes. Our data highlight the merits of a multifaceted provincial system for enabling consistent access to high quality HPB care throughout a region of 15 million people over a 16-year period.

Long-term Functional Outcomes Among Older Adults Undergoing Video-assisted Versus Open Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Population-based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term healthcare dependency outcomes of older adults undergoing VATS compared to open lung cancer resection. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although the benefits of VATS for lung cancer resection have been reported, there is a knowledge gap related to long-term functional outcomes central to decision-making for older adults. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective comparative cohort study of patients ≥70 years old undergoing lung cancer resection between 2010 and 2017 using linked administrative health databases. VATS was compared to open surgery for lung cancer resection. Outcomes were receipt of homecare and high time-at-home, defined as <14 institution-days within 1 year, in 5 years after surgery. We used time-to-event analyses. Homecare was analyzed as recurrent dichotomous outcome with Andersen-Gill multivariable models, and high time-at-home with Cox multivariable models. RESULTS: Of 4974 patients, 2951 had VATS (59.3%). In the first three months postoperatively, homecare use ranged from 17.5% to 34.4% for VATS and 23.0% to 36.6% for open surgery. VATS was independently associated with lower need for postoperative homecare over 5 years (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.92). 1- and 5-year probability of high "time-at-home" were superior for VATS (74.4% vs 66.7% and 55.6% vs 45.4%, p < 0.001). VATS was independently associated with higher probability of high "time-at-home" (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.89) compared to open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to open surgery, VATS was associated with lower homecare needs and higher probability of high "time-at-home," indicating reduced long-term functional dependence. Those important patient-centered endpoints reflect the overall long-term treatment burden on mortality and morbidity that can inform surgical decision-making.

Symptom Assessment Following Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Canadian Population-based Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a population-level analysis of temporal trends and risk factors for high symptom burden in patients receiving surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). BACKGROUND: A population-level overview of symptoms after curative intent surgery is necessary to inform decision making and supportive care for patients with lung cancer. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients receiving surgery for stages I to III NSCLC between January 2007 and September 2018. Prospectively collection Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) scores, linked to provincial administrative data, were used to describe the prevalence, trajectory, and predictors of moderate-to-severe symptoms in the year following surgery. RESULTS: A total of 5350 patients, with 28,490 unique ESAS assessments, were included in the analysis. Moderate-to-severe tiredness (68%), poor wellbeing (63%), and shortness of breath (60%) were the most common symptoms reported. The rise and fall in the proportion of patients experiencing moderate-to-severe symptoms after surgery coincided with the median time to first (58 days, interquartile range: 47-72) and last cycle of chemotherapy (140 days, interquartile range: 118-168), respectively. There was eventual stabilization, albeit above the preoperative baseline, within 6 to 7 months after surgery. Female sex (relative risk [RR] 1.09- 1.26), lower income (RR 1.08-1.23), stage III disease (RR 1.15-1.43), adjuvant therapy (RR 1.09-1.42), chemotherapy within 2 weeks of an ESAS assessment (RR 1.14-1.73), and pneumonectomy (RR 1.05-1.15) were associated with moderate-to-severe symptoms following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of population-level prevalence, trajectory, and predictors of moderate-to-severe symptoms after surgery for NSCLC can be used to facilitate shared decision making and improve symptom management throughout the course of illness.

Long-term Dependency in Older Adults After Surgery or Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine long-term healthcare dependency outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to surgery for older adults with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). BACKGROUND: SBRT is an emerging alternative to surgery in patients with early-stage lung cancer. There remains a paucity of prospective studies comparing these modalities, especially with respect to long-term dependency outcomes in older adults with lung cancer. METHODS: Adults 70 years old and above with stage I NSCLC treated with surgery or SBRT from January 2010 to December 2017 were analyzed using 1:1 propensity score matching. Homecare use, days at home, and time spent alive and at home were compared. E-value methods assessed residual confounding. RESULTS: A total of 1129 and 2570 patients underwent SBRT and surgery, respectively. In all, 1016 per group were matched. SBRT was associated with a higher overall risk of homecare utilization [hazard ratio (HR)=1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37-2.23] than surgery up to 5 years following treatment. While the hazards of death or nursing home admission were lower in the first 3 months after SBRT (HR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.36-0.85), they became consistently higher beyond this period and remained high up to 5 years compared with surgery (HR=2.13; 95% CI: 1.85-2.45). The above findings persisted in stratified analyses for frail patients and those with no pretreatment homecare. E-values indicated it was unlikely that the observed estimates could be explained by unmeasured confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery offers robust long-term dependency outcomes compared with SBRT. These are important patient-centered endpoints which may be used for counseling and shared decision-making in older adults with stage I NSCLC.

Co-Learning Curriculum in Quality Improvement for Surgical Residents- Five-Year Experience from the University of Toronto.

OBJECTIVE: We describe our five-year experience with a novel co-learning curriculum in quality improvement (CCQI)1 for the largest reported cohort of surgical residents. The program introduces trainees to principles of quality improvement (QI)2 and empowers them to complete collaborative projects with mentorship from faculty experts. DESIGN: Each iteration consists of three interactive seminars. Residents are required to complete and present a QI project in the third seminar. To assess the impact of the program, graduates of the 2020-2021 iteration were surveyed using validated tools to examine changes in confidence and knowledge of QI principles. SETTING: Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Participation ranged from 57 to 63 residents yearly, from diverse surgical disciplines including General Surgery, Plastic Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, amongst others. Multiple small groups consisted of 4-6 residents from each speciality, mentored by a faculty lead from the same specialty. RESULTS: Approximately 300 first-year surgical residents have participated in the CCQI since 2015, with over 60 completed QI projects. A total of 41(66%) and 51(82%) residents completed the survey in its pre- and post-course administration in 2020-2021, respectively. There was a significant increase in confidence scores with respect to describing a QI issue, building a team, and testing the change, amongst other aspects. There was also a statistically significant increase in mean knowledge scores for both scenarios of the Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool. 69% and 73% of residents reported "some improvement" in their knowledge, and confidence in applying QI principles to patient care, respectively. A majority of residents (73%) found the QI curriculum somewhat valuable, with 23% reporting it to be very valuable to their residency and future surgical career. CONCLUSIONS: We describe successful long-term implementation of a novel co-learning curriculum in quality improvement. Residents derive value from this curriculum with a meaningful increase in confidence and knowledge of QI as an integral part of surgical practice.

The effect of operative duration on the outcome of colon cancer procedures.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged operative duration has been associated with increased post-operative morbidity in numerous surgical subspecialties; however, data are limited in operations for colon cancer specifically and existing literature makes unwarranted methodological assumptions of linearity. We sought to assess the effects of extended operative duration on perioperative outcomes in those undergoing segmental colectomy for cancer using a methodologically sound approach. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing segmental colectomy for cancer between 2014 and 2018, logged in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program datasets. Our primary outcome was a composite of any complication within 30 days; secondary outcomes included length of stay and discharge disposition. Our main factor of interest was operative duration. RESULTS: We analyzed 26,380 segmental colectomy cases, the majority of which were approached laparoscopically (64.95%) and were right sided (62.93%). Median operative duration was 152 (95% CI 112-206) minutes. On multivariable regression, increased operative duration was linearly associated with any complication (OR = 1.003, 95% CI 1.003-1.003, p < 0.0001) in the overall cohort, as was length of stay (p < 0.0001). All subgroups except for the laparoscopic left colectomy group were linearly associated with operative duration. In the laparoscopic left colectomy group, an inflection point in the odds of any complication was found at 176 min (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.20-1.61, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the risk of perioperative complications increases linearly with increasing operative duration, where each additional 30 min increases the odds of complication by 10%. In those undergoing laparoscopic left colectomy, the risk of complications sharply increases after ~ 3 h, suggesting that surgeons should aim to complete these procedures within 3 h where possible.

Impact of BMI on Adverse Events After Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: The impact of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes after open or laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer remains unclear. The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the interaction of body mass index and surgical modality (i.e., laparoscopy versus open) with respect to short-term clinical outcomes in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP database (2012-2016) was reviewed for patients undergoing open or laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause morbidity. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 16,145 patients were grouped into open (N = 6759, 42%) and laparoscopic (N  = 9386, 58%) cohorts. Patients with higher BMI (p < 0.001) and those undergoing open surgery (p < 0.001) were at increased risk of all-cause morbidity. There was no significant change in the odds ratio of experiencing all-cause morbidity between open and laparoscopic surgery with increasing BMI (p = 0.572). Median length of stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group (4 days vs. 6 days; p < 0.001), at the cost of increased operative time (239 min vs. 210 min, p < 0.001). The difference in operative time between laparoscopy and open surgery did not increase with rising BMI (i.e., ∆37 min vs. ∆39 min at BMI 25 kg/m2 vs 50 kg/m2, respectively, p = 0.491). CONCLUSION: BMI may not be a strong modifier for surgical approach with respect to short-term clinical outcomes in patients with obesity and rectal cancer. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with improved short-term clinical outcomes, without much change in the absolute difference in operative time compared with open surgery, even at higher BMIs.

Anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: does timing affect failure to rescue?

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common complication after colectomy with a relatively high failure to rescue rate (FTR), or death after major complications. There is emerging evidence to suggest an early AL may be associated with increased technical difficulty. Whether the timing of an AL is associated with higher FTR has not been established. METHODS: Patients who underwent a colectomy between 2012 and 2017 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP database). The primary outcome was FTR after AL. The predictor variable used was day of post-operative leak (POD) categorized into early (POD ≤ 3), intermediate (3 < POD ≤ 20) and late (20 < POD ≤ 30) AL. These POD groups were compared to generate hypotheses to explain any association observed between timing of AL and FTR. RESULTS: Of 135,539 identified patients, 4613 patients experienced an AL (3.4%) with an overall FTR of 6.4%. FTR differed by timing of AL: early AL was found to have a FTR of 28/195 (12.6%), with a FTR in intermediate AL of 152/2550 (5.6%) and 3/356 (0.8%) in late AL patients (p < 0.0001). When compared by timing of AL, patients differed by sex, pre-operative bowel preparation, de-functioning ostomy rates and re-operation rates (p < 0.05). Controlling for age, ASA, sex, emergency status, operative approach, indication, de-functioning ostomy, re-operation and concurrent procedure, an early AL was found to have a 2.3-fold increased risk of FTR (95% CI 1.38-3.84, p = 0.001), with a late AL having a 0.15-fold decreased risk (95% CI 0.04-0.49, p = 0.002), both compared to an intermediate AL. CONCLUSION: Early ALs, occurring within three days of surgery, may carry a significant risk of FTR. Given the findings identified here, this may support the use of early detection algorithms and interventions of AL to minimize the risk of FTR.

Leveraging Videoconferencing Technology to Augment Surgical Training During a Pandemic.

Our objective was to review the use of videoconferencing as a practical tool for remote surgical education and to propose a model to overcome the impact of a pandemic on resident training. Summary Background Data: In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, most institutions and residency programs have been restructured to minimize the number of residents in the hospital as well as their interactions with patients and to promote physical distancing measures. This has resulted in decreased resident operative exposure, responsibility, and autonomy, hindering their educational goals and ability to achieve surgical expertise necessary for independent practice. Methods: We conducted a narrative review to explore the use of videoconferencing for remote broadcasting of surgical procedures, telecoaching using surgical videos, telesimulation for surgical skills training, and establishing a didactic lecture series. Results and Conclusions: We present a multimodal approach for using practical videoconferencing tools that provide the means for audiovisual communication to help augment residents' operative experience and limit the impact of self-isolation, redeployment, and limited operative exposure on surgical training.

Will My Patient Survive an Anastomotic Leak? Predicting Failure to Rescue Using the Modified Frailty Index.

IMPORTANCE: Failure to rescue (FTR), or death after major complications, has emerged as a marker of hospital-level quality of care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive performance of the ACS-NSQIP modified frailty index (mFI) in determining FTR following an anastomotic leak (AL) after a colectomy for colorectal cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multicenter interrogation of the 2012-2016 American College of Surgeons (ACS) colectomy procedure targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 50,944 patients who underwent colectomy for colorectal cancer. EXPOSURE: Frailty as measured by: (1) Age, ASA, and emergency status (model 1), (2) Age, ASA, emergency status, and mFI (model 2), (3) ACS-NSQIP mortality prediction (model 3). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Primary outcome was FTR after AL. RESULTS: A total of 1755 patients experienced an AL (3.46%) with a FTR rate of 6.44%. The mean age was 65.6 years (95% CI 65.28-65.58 years), median ASA was 3 (IQR 2-3), 51 patients (2.92%) were partially or totally dependent, 366 (20.86%) were diabetic, 105 (5.98%) had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 32 (1.82%) had a history of congestive heart disease (CHD), and 966 (55.04%) were on hypertensive treatment. The performance of model 1 (AUROC 0.77; 95% CI 0.72-0.81), model 2 (AUROC 0.77; 95% CI 0.73-0.82), and model 3 (AUROC 0.79; 95% CI 0.75-0.83) to predict FTR was not different (p = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Age and ASA remain the most reliable predictors of failure to rescue anastomotic leak after colectomy for colorectal cancer. Addition of the modified frailty index, or all variables collected by NSQIP, did not significantly improve predictive performance.

Adequacy of lymph node harvest following colectomy for obstructed and nonobstructed colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Technical and clinical differences in resection of obstructed and non-obstructed colon cancers may result in differences in lymph node retrieval. The objective of this study is to compare the lymph node harvest following resection of obstructed and nonobstructed colon cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis utilizing the 2014-2018 NSQIP colectomy targeted data set was conducted. One-to-one coarsened exact matching (CEM) was utilized between patients undergoing resection for obstructed and non-obstructed colon cancer. The primary outcome was the adequacy of lymph node retrieval (LNR, ≥12 nodes). RESULTS: CEM resulted in 9412 patients. Patients with obstructed tumors were more likely to have inadequate LNR (13.3% vs 8.2%, p < .001) compared to those with nonobstructed tumors. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with obstructing tumors had worse LNR compared to non-obstructed tumors (odds ratio [OR]: 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62-0.87; p < .005). Increased age (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.098-0.99), presence of preoperative sepsis (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.055-0.90), left-sided and sigmoid tumors compared to right-sided (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.81; OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58-0.82, respectively), and open surgical resection compared to an minimally invasive surgical approach were associated with inadequate LNR (p < .05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that resection for obstructing colon cancer compared to non-obstructed colon cancer is associated with increased odds of inadequate lymph node harvest.

From Emergency Department Visit to Readmission After Esophagectomy: Analysis of Burden and Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Frequent emergency department (ED) visits occur after esophagectomy. We aimed to identify the incidence of and risk factors for conversion from ED visit to inpatient admission. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of consecutive esophagectomies at a tertiary Canadian center (1999 to 2014). Multivariable regression analyses identified factors associated with conversion from ED visit to admission. RESULTS: There were 520 esophagectomies with 6% inhospital mortality (n = 31). Of those discharged, 29.7% (n = 145) had one or more emergency visit and 43.4% (n = 63) of these patients were readmitted to the hospital. First-time ED visits resulted in inpatient conversion 23.4% of the time (n = 34); successive ED visits resulted in increasing conversion. On multivariable analysis, anastomotic leak (adjusted odds ratio 2.45; 95% confidence interval, 1 to 6.01; P = .05) was independently associated with higher odds of conversion to admission. Sensitivity analysis using Poisson regression to model conversion as a rate identified that living in regions further away was associated with lower conversion rate to admission (risk ratio 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.13 to 0.94; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Although postesophagectomy ED utilization is high, the majority of visits do not convert to admission. With each increasing ED visit, likelihood of converting to admission increases. Anastomotic leakage was associated with higher odds of conversion to admission, possibly related to development of strictures. Access to urgent outpatient endoscopy may help reduce the incidence of ED visits and admission. Although living in regions further away is associated with lower conversion rates to admission at the index hospital, that may be due to patients utilizing closer local hospitals.

Choosing the right survey-patient reported outcomes in esophageal surgery.

Patient reported outcomes (PROs) fulfill a crucial and unique niche in patient management, providing health-care providers a glimpse into their patients' health experience. This is of utmost importance in patients with benign and malignant disorders of esophagus requiring surgery, which carries significant morbidity, in part due to a high burden of symptoms affecting health-related quality of life (HRQOL). There are a variety of generic and disease-specific patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) available for use in esophageal surgery. This article provides a broad overview of commonly used HRQOL instruments in esophageal surgery, including their utility in comparative effectiveness research, prognostication and shared decision-making for patients undergoing surgery for benign and malignant disorders of the esophagus.

Leadership proficiency in surgery: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Summary: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accentuated the importance of leadership training for health care professionals, particularly surgeons. Surgeons are expected to lead and thrive in multidisciplinary teams. There is, however, a critical gap in teaching residents about fundamental leadership principles, such as developing productive and vision-driven teams, conflict resolution and emotional intelligence. We discuss the merits of leadership training for surgical residents and future directions for implementing a leadership curriculum for Canadian residency programs in the competency by design era.

Severe symptoms persist for Up to one year after diagnosis of stage I-III lung cancer: An analysis of province-wide patient reported outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer is associated with significant disease- and treatment-related morbidity. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) is a tool developed to elicit patients' own assessment of the severity of common cancer-associated symptoms. The objective of this study was to examine symptom severity in the 12 months following diagnosis of lung cancer, and to identify predictors of high symptom burden. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study, including patients with stage I-III lung cancer diagnosed between 2007-2016, and who had symptom screening in the 12 months following diagnosis. The proportion of patients reporting severe symptoms (ESAS ≥ 7) in the year following diagnosis was plotted over time. Multivariable regression models were constructed to identify factors associated with severe symptoms. RESULTS: 69,440 unique symptom assessments were reported by 11,075 lung cancer patients. Tiredness was the most prevalent severe symptom (47.3 %), followed by shortness of breath (39.4 %) and poor wellbeing (36.5 %) among all disease stages. Patients diagnosed with higher stage disease reported more severe symptoms, but symptom trajectories were similar for all stages in the year following diagnosis. Disease stage (RR 1.10-2.01), comorbidity burden (RR 1.17-1.51), degree of socioeconomic marginalization (RR1.15-1.45), and female sex (RR 1.15-1.50) were associated with reporting severe symptoms in the year following diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Severe physical and psychological symptoms persist throughout the first year following lung cancer diagnosis, regardless of disease stage. Those at risk of experiencing high symptom burden may benefit from targeted supportive care interventions, including psychosocial support aimed at improving health-related quality of life.

Racial Disparities in Surgery: A Cross-Specialty Matched Comparison Between Black and White Patients.

Objective: To determine if Black race is associated with worse short-term postoperative morbidity and mortality when compared to White race in a contemporary, cross-specialty-matched cohort. Background: Growing evidence suggests poorer outcomes for Black patients undergoing surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted comprising of all patients undergoing surgery in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset between 2012 and 2018. One-to-one coarsened exact matching was conducted between Black and White patients. Primary outcome was rate of 30-day morbidity and mortality. Results: After 1:1 matching, 615,118 patients were identified. Black race was associated with increased rate of all-cause morbidity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.13, P < 0.001) and mortality (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.31, P = 0.039). Black race was associated with increased risk of re-intubation (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.21-1.48, P < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.40-1.71, P < 0.001), failure to wean from ventilator for >48 hours (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.29, P < 0.001), progressive renal insufficiency (OR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.43-1.86, P < 0.001), acute renal failure (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.16-1.66, P < 0.001), cardiac arrest (OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.24-1.76 P < 0.001), bleeding requiring transfusion (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.34-1.43, P < 0.001), DVT/thrombophlebitis (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.35, P < 0.001), and sepsis/septic shock (OR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.15, P < 0.001). Black patients were also more likely to have a readmission (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.10-1.16, P < 0.001), discharge to a rehabilitation center (OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.66-1.80, P < 0.001) or facility other than home (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.16-1.23, P < 0.001). Conclusion and Relevance: This contemporary matched analysis demonstrates an association with increased morbidity, mortality, and readmissions for Black patients across surgical procedures and specialties.